Skip to Main Content

Informative Writing

Unit Plan

Informative Writing

Objectives

In this unit, students will write cause-and-effect expository nonfiction. Students will:

  • examine cause-and-effect relationships by differentiating types of causes.
  • complete a graphic organizer of cause-and-effect relationships.
  • research information for a cause-and-effect essay.
  • compose and revise a cause-and-effect essay.
  • categorize subtle differences between relevant transition words.

Essential Questions

How do grammar and the conventions of language influence spoken and written communication?
How do readers know what to believe in what they read, hear, and view?
How do strategic readers create meaning from informational and literary text?
How does interaction with text provoke thinking and response?
What is the purpose?
What is this text really about?
What makes clear and effective writing?
What will work best for the audience?
Who is the audience?
Why do writers write?
  • Why do writers write? What is the purpose?
  • What makes clear and effective writing?
  • How do grammar and the conventions of language influence spoken and written communication?
  • How does one best present findings?

Related Unit and Lesson Plans

Related Materials & Resources

The possible inclusion of commercial websites below is not an implied endorsement of their products, which are not free, and are not required for this lesson plan.

Formative Assessment

  • View

    Performance Assessment:

    Students should write a formal informative essay using a cause-and-effect organizational structure on a topic of their choice. The audience is adults who are interested in the topic.

    Performance Assessment Scoring Rubric:

    Use the following Cause-and-Effect Essay Scoring Guideline (LW-8-2-3_Cause-and-Effect Scoring Guideline.docx). You may also choose to use the Informational Scoring Guidelines (LW-8-2_Informational Scoring Guidelines 6-8.docx) to evaluate students’ writing.

     

    Points

    Description

    4

    FOCUS: Sharp, distinct, restricted thesis on a cause-and-effect topic with evident awareness of task and audience.

    CONTENT DEVELOPMENT: Substantial, relevant, and illustrative content that demonstrates a clear understanding of the cause-and-effect relationship through the use of clear and focused topic sentences. Thorough elaboration with effectively presented and appropriately documented information, consistently supported with well-chosen facts, examples, and details.

    ORGANIZATION: Effective organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and well-chosen transitions, which develop a controlling idea.

    STYLE: Precise control of language, stylistic techniques, and sentence structures that creates a consistent and effective tone.

    CONVENTIONS: Few or no errors in conventions, appropriate use of conditional tense.

    3

    FOCUS: Clear controlling thesis on a cause-and-effect topic with general awareness of task and audience.

    CONTENT DEVELOPMENT: Adequate, specific, and/or illustrative content that demonstrates an understanding of the cause-and-effect relationship through the use of appropriate topic sentences. Sufficient elaboration with clearly presented and researched information supported with well-chosen facts, examples, and details.

    ORGANIZATION: Organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, which develop a controlling idea.

    STYLE: Appropriate control of language, stylistic techniques, and sentence structures that creates a consistent tone.

    CONVENTIONS: Several errors in conventions, mostly appropriate use of conditional tense.

    2

    FOCUS: Vague evidence of a controlling thesis made about a cause-and-effect topic with an inconsistent awareness of task and audience.

    CONTENT DEVELOPMENT: Inadequate, vague content that demonstrates a weak understanding of the cause-and-effect relationship with vague topic sentences. Underdeveloped and/or repetitive elaboration with inconsistently supported and poorly researched information. May be an extended list of facts, examples, and/or details.

    ORGANIZATION: Inconsistent organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, which would effectively develop a controlling idea.

    STYLE: Limited control of language and sentence structures that creates interference with tone.

    CONVENTIONS: Many errors in conventions, somewhat inappropriate use of conditional tense.

    1

    FOCUS: Little or no evidence of a controlling thesis made about a cause-and-effect topic, with a minimal awareness of task and audience.

    CONTENT DEVELOPMENT: Minimal evidence of content that demonstrates understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. May lack topic sentences. Superficial, undeveloped writing with little or no support or research. May be a bare list.

    ORGANIZATION: Little or no evidence of organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, which would adequately develop a controlling idea.

    STYLE: Minimal control of language and sentence structures, which creates an inconsistent tone.

    CONVENTIONS: Disruptive errors in conventions, inappropriate use or no use of conditional tense.

    0

    Student demonstrates a lack of understanding of the task or makes no attempt to complete the performance task.

     

Final 06/28/2013
Loading
Please wait...